I wonder if it makes sense to combine the two at all. Initially, it's probably safe to make a separate package and then consider factoring out common types and behaviors after the fact. Looking forward to seeing this!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on a cursory read of the linked page, there doesn't seem to be a > connection of practical significance. > > I'm going to start coding up a little package. I did note the > FiniteStateMachine <https://github.com/tensorjack/FiniteStateMachine.jl> > package, which is somewhat related but doesn't have transducers or support > many operations. > > On Tuesday, 7 October 2014 13:57:11 UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> Not that I'm aware of. Possibly dumb question that I can't seem to find >> the answer to: what connection, if any, is there between these transducers >> and Clojure's new concept >> <http://blog.cognitect.com/blog/2014/8/6/transducers-are-coming> by the >> same name? >> >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Oliver Adams <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi there. I'm interested in doing some work with weighted finite-state >>> transducers in Julia. If there's something in the spirit of OpenFst or the >>> Python wrapper pyfst, it'd be great to know. If not then it might be fun, >>> educational and maybe even practical to implement some stuff myself. But >>> I'd rather not reinvent the wheel - has anyone been working on a package >>> that does this sort of stuff? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >>
