I had a go at embedding vt100.js (the terminal used for JuliaBox) in Light Table. I just about managed to get it going UI-wise, but didn't manage to get a bash/repl session going (I suspect you need to tell bash that you're emulating a terminal or something, but really I have no idea about this stuff).
Anyway, I can package up my progress somewhere if you're interested. On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 02:53:44 UTC+1, Jacob Quinn wrote: > > I guess my motivation for Sublime-Julia and subsequently Sublime-IJulia > was that most of the options on windows suck! There were always encoding > issues, or line length weirdness, or general lack of features. Hacking up a > repl in Sublime wasn't terribly difficult and I do enjoy having the repl > right there in sublime to send code over. I live all day with 2 panes in > sublime, one for coding and one for evaluating and it seems to work pretty > well for me, particularly for not having spent a ton of time on it. > > If something better came along that was just as easy/convenient, I'm > pretty eager at trying new things. I've actually been thinking about doing > a similar repl "view" of sorts in LightTable (building on Juno's work) or > the new Atom editor (has the most momentum currently). > > -Jacob > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Patrick O'Leary <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Monday, October 13, 2014 6:35:11 PM UTC-5, David Anthoff wrote: >>> >>> Might also be worth keeping in mind re the discussion whether minty >>> should be bundled with julia on windows, maybe that whole problem will just >>> solve itself by waiting… >>> >> >> We'll be waiting a long while before corporate deployments catch up with >> Windows 10, I'm afraid. >> >> (Also, are we skipping 9? I missed that news.) >> > >
