yeah, the function I'm intending to inspect will be defined by me and they 
shouldn't be varargs

On Thursday, October 16, 2014 2:10:34 PM UTC-4, Toivo Henningsson wrote:
>
> Though you should probably look out for varargs methods too, the length of 
> e.g. (Int...) is one, but a method with that signature can take any number 
> of arguments. 

Reply via email to