Hi Andreas, Thanks for your reply - I had read that part of the manual, but apparently that didn't keep me from committing such a fundamental error. Given that I need to store the result of the function call inside the parallel for loop, who do I have to rewrite the loop to get the result otuside the loop? Or is this simply not possible as for loops are designed for small computations, so that they don't make sense if there's a lot of data to be sent back and forth?
Further, I'm not sure how this relates to the second point in my original post: why does the program finish that quickly if I parallelize the outer part of the loop? Best, Nils
