On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Patrick O'Leary <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thursday, November 6, 2014 6:28:24 AM UTC-6, Michele Zaffalon wrote:
>>
>> I am probably not the first one to notice that the return values from the
>> functions of the standard library are not documented. There is no ambiguity
>> in the cases in which the function returns no or one argument. But there is
>> for cases such as gcdx
>> <http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/?highlight=gcd#Base.gcdx> 
>> which
>> returns three values.
>> Will the documentation be done at some point? Has no agreement be reached
>> on how to document it?
>>
>
> Broken math formatting notwithstanding, I'm not sure what the confusion
> is: the three return value are the gcd, and the Bézout coefficients `u` and
> `v`.
>

Oops, I should learn to read.

>
> If you think there's a better way to show that, please propose a change!
> It's really easy to make documentation contributions; head to the file in
> GitHub (you'll find your example in base.rst:
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/doc/stdlib/base.rst),
> click the pencil button (next to Raw/Blame/History at the top of the
> formatted view of the file) and make your proposed edits. GitHub will fork
> the repository for you, and when you're done it will help you with the pull
> request.
>

Thank you for the instructions.
michele

Reply via email to