Hi
I'm trying to automate some code and thought Julia's metaprogramming might
help, but I've got myself very confused.
I have a user-defined composite type, which for different applications, I
change the fields.
I also want to define some functions for this user type (+, copy, == etc)
because I change the composite fields regularly, I thought I could
somehow use Julia's introspection / metaprogramming to define these
functions.
Suppose I define:
type Counters
counter1::Array{Int64,1}
counter2::Array{Int64,1}
counter3::Array{Int64,1}
counter4::Array{Int64,1}
counter5::Array{Int64,2}
# no-argument constructor
function Counters()
this = new()
this.counter1 = zeros(Int64, 100000)
this.counter2 = zeros(Int64, 100000)
this.counter3 = zeros(Int64, 100000)
this.counter4 = zeros(Int64, 500)
this.counter5 = zeros(Int64, 500, 1000)
return this
end
end
Defined explicitly, my + function would look something like:
function +(c1::Counters, c2::Counters)
c = Counters()
c.counter1 = c1.counter1 + c2.counter1
c.counter2 = c1.counter2 + c2.counter2
c.counter3 = c1.counter3 + c2.counter3
c.counter4 = c1.counter4 + c2.counter4
c.counter5 = c1.counter5 + c2.counter5
return c
end
I was hoping I could define implicitly using macros / metaprogramming:
function +(c1::Counters, c2::Counters)
c = Counters()
for field in names(Counters)
ex = :(c.$field = c1.$field + c2.$field)
eval(ex)
end
return c
end
I know this doesn't work, but I've tried many variations but always seem to
get stuck.
I would like the function to be eval-ed and unrolled at compile time, so
that it executes fast at run time.
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks, Greg