On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Noack <[email protected]> wrote: > The function that fails is var, not sum. However, I really don't think that > var is the problem.
D'oh. I didn't read carefully enough. It turns out that the current implementation of `var` does not actually need to know zero value if one unrolls the loop there. Let me give it a try. -erik -- Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
