I tried with the latest 0.3.3 release and with 0.4.0-dev+1061 version, but both are giving errors.
As Amit has already created a similar issue, should I still open another issue ? Regards, Kapil Agarwal On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Tim Holy <[email protected]> wrote: > That error message sequence reminds me of the one I saw in debugging a > problem > on julia 0.4 that was missing a "GC root," meaning that some julia variable > allocated from the C code was not being correctly protected from garbage- > collection. > > While the bug I fixed can't be present on 0.3 (the relevant code is julia > 0.4- > only), it is possible that your bug has been fixed by someone else in the > meantime---there have been quite a few updates to the 0.3 series. Since > you're > running a slightly outdated version, can you update to the latest 0.3 > release? > > If updating doesn't fix it, please file an issue with the code needed to > reproduce the problem. > > Best, > --Tim > > On Sunday, November 23, 2014 07:48:08 PM Kapil Agarwal wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am running a parallel matrix transpose using Julia. When I run it on a > > small matrix with small number of workers, it works fine, but as I > increase > > the size and the number of workers, it starts giving MemoryError() and > > Broken pipe signals. > > > > I have put the error stacktrace here : > > https://github.com/kapiliitr/JuliaBenchmarks/blob/master/error.txt > > > > I checked that my program was not making any bounds errors and that the > > result is correct. Also, I did not find any errors in the source code > from > > the stacktrace. > > I am basically dealing with large matrices of the order of 1000X1000 > > elements and around 50-200 worker processes. > > > > I have a machine with 24 cores and around 24 GB memory, so could this be > a > > problem with my system or is there a limit to how many workers Julia can > > launch and allocate memory ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Kapil > >
