That's a good point John. I definitely had the thought looking over the
outline that a bunch of the 0.4 changes will make certain parts out of date
pretty quickly.

Then again, I figured if I helped review, I could perhaps help push things
in a good direction and help make it as timely as possible.

-Jacob

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:35 PM, John Myles White <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I hate to say it, but Packt's handling of its Julia publications is rather
> troubling. I received a request to review this book and told them I wasn't
> free, but the truth is that I would prefer that they not pubilsh this kind
> of book at all right now. The blurb refers to several things that may not
> even exist in JuliaStats, including lists, factors and ANOVA's. I think the
> whole thing is premature.
>
>  -- John
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 3:31 PM, Wilfred Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I received an email today about being a technical reviewer for a book on
> Julia!
>
> We're currently developing a book titled *Mastering Julia* aiming at
>> building statistical models with linear regressions and analysis of
>> variance (ANOVA) and will be working on probability, probability
>> distributions, and random variables covering  data structures such as
>> matrices, lists, factors, and data frames. This book is targeted at 
>> Intermediate
>> level developer in statistical languages and one who will be having
>> understanding of Core elements and applications.
>>
>> Would you be interested in acting as reviewer for this book?
>>
> Now, I enjoy Julia, and I'm happy to help promote the language, but I
> don't think I'm particularly qualified to be a technical reviewer of a book
> on Julia programming. I found this thread on julia-dev:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/julia-dev/HrdpknFgdfk/SAVMyyacT_sJ
> where Packt contacted a large number of folks seeking an author.
>
> Has anyone else received something like this? In principle, I'm all in
> favour of producing promotional or teaching materials, but I'm surprised it
> lead to me being contacted.
>
>
>

Reply via email to