Yes, there's no real enforcement of privacy. This is similar to other popular dynamic languages like Python and Ruby.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Petr Krysl <[email protected]> wrote: > I see, I missed the bit about the non-exported function p. > > But that kind of worries me (am I the only one?). If I can get at > anything within a module, nothing is ever protected? I cannot have a > private function, shared only by the functions within the module? > > In the same vein: there are no private fields within types. > > So I guess the Julia way of doing things is TRUST. There is no > encapsulation apparently. > > Am I wrong? > > Petr > >> >>>>>
