Yes I am very pleased with the result too! Really impressed with both the julia language and community. Keep up the good work!
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 6:17:40 PM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Great – thanks for reporting back. It's nice that you could get that kind > of good performance here without too much shenanigans. > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Andre Bieler <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> for completeness: >> >> with the inner loops now going through the first index as suggested by >> Jeff, >> there was another increase in speed. So now I stand at *16.8 s* on >> average >> with julia. >> >> The same thing in python/numpy takes roughly *6800 s* to run >> (however not vectorized in numpy, using for loops as in the examples >> above) >> > >
