Tamas makes a good point, it depends on if your interest is in Julia as a language or Julia as a way of getting stuff done. Both communities are active, but I doubt they have the same definition of "well written" :)
Cheers Lex On Saturday, December 13, 2014 5:23:41 PM UTC+10, Tamas Papp wrote: > > I like reading library code from the Julia core team for learning > purposes, especially libraries for 0.4. Given how fast Julia is moving, > I would not expect anything super-polished at this stage outside > libraries, especially since in scientific computing the programs > themselves are used only a few times (compared to other kinds of > software). > > Best, > > Tamas > > On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Tom Fawcett <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Hi, all. I'm slowly moving over to Julia from Python. There is just > > enough of a difference of Julia from other languages that I'd like to > find > > a well-written, small to medium-sized Julia program to study its coding > > style and code organization. It doesn't have to be huge; just a > > well-organized collection of modules and classes/types. Any nominations > > for exemplary Julia? > > > > (I've gone through various library code files, but libraries aren't > > organized the same as programs. I've skimmed a few of the programs in > > Julia.jl but it's hard to determine what's considered well-written.) > > > > Thanks, > > -Tom >
