come to think of it that is the right semantics. well designed language this is!
On Monday, December 15, 2014 3:35:22 PM UTC-5, John Myles White wrote: > > You need to check isnan() per element. NaN == NaN is false, so in() fails > on NaN right now. > > -- John > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Evan Pu <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > 1 in [1,2,3] # returns true > > > > NaN in [NaN, 1.0, 2.0] # returns false > > > > how do I test if a float64 NaN is present in an array? I'm doing some > numerical computation and it can have some NaN error, I want to drop the > arrays that has NaN. > >
