Hi, 

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 11:21:44 PM UTC+1, Seth wrote:
>
> I'm wondering whether folks are actually basing their repos in ~/.julia 
> and doing their development and commits from there, or whether there's some 
> other process that allows development to happen in a more standard location 
> than a hidden directory off of ~ while still allowing use of Pkg. I'm 
> probably overlooking something trivial.
>
> What's a recommended setup/process for creating packages using Pkg to 
> manage them?
>

I'm not sure what the right answer would be, but I have been struggling 
with it a lot.  This is my set-up for most of the stuff I do.  

 - I develop packages in their own directories on the user filesystem.  For 
me, that would be `.../julia/<package>/` .  
 - from there, in `./src/` I have the various source files.  One, 
specifically is called "nomodule.jl".  This contains a 
   - "require(<types.jl>)"
   - "include(<functions.jl>)"
   - ...
 - Each time I change something in the code, I do a `reload("nomodule.jl`) 
from the REPL.  This replaces all functions, except for the type 
definitions---they can't be updated
 - When I need to change the types, I need to do a `ctrl-D; julia; 
reload("nomodule.jl")` which can be a bit of a pain
 - When I am happy with the functionality, I make this code into a module, 
using a file "<Module>.jl", very similar to the "nomodule.jl" but with the 
"require" replaced by "include"
 - I sync this then with github
 - If I need the functionality from another working directory, I do a 
`Pkg.clone(<github>)` to load a sort-of-stable version into ~/.julia
 - When I am really happy with the code, I do a pull request to METADATA.jl 
for my package to be included in the standard set of Julia packages. 

 - If I need functionality on some other machines, I sync using git, either 
through github or directly.

 Cheers, 

---david

Reply via email to