Hi Craig,

If you haven't yet, you should read through the Performance Tips section of
the manual.

One easy thing you should try is to wrap the main code in a function. While
this will hopefully change before v1.0, Julia has a hard time optimizing
code in global scope.

Cheers,
   Kevin

On Tuesday, January 6, 2015, Craig Bosma <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been playing with Julia lately by creating a little toy mandelbrot
> set computation, and trying to optimize it for comparison with a C++
> version. I've also been trying to parallelize it to learn more about
> Julia's parallel computing model and to compare with parallel
> implementations in C++. My latest implementation can be found in this
> gist. <https://gist.github.com/bosmacs/eb329dc8360dbf1282b1>
>
> On my machine, this runs in about 50 seconds, with (23622108264 bytes
> allocated, 20.50% gc time) when executed serially. Those allocations seem
> excessive to me, but I'm not sure what to do about it. With 8 workers on 4
> cores, I can cut that down to about 20 seconds. On the same machine, my C++
> serial/parallel implementations run in ~8s/2s. I expected the difference to
> be a less than a full order of magnitude, so I guess I'm wondering if there
> are any obvious performance problems with my implementation. If anyone has
> any suggestions of how to improve my code, I'd sure like to hear about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>

Reply via email to