We also, when it makes linguistic sense tend to have the order verb(subj,obj). 
The in operator is a case of this.


> On Jan 11, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Steven G. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For any infix operator O, O(x,y) is equivalent to x O y. Since "in" is an 
> infix operator, it follows the same convention.

Reply via email to