I'm new to Julia myself and not an expert, but tried to give an answer to a 
similar question on quora:

http://www.quora.com/Is-Julia-ready-for-production-use/answer/Eric-Forgy


On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 11:28:58 AM UTC+8, Carlos Baptista wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> C. F. Baptista
>
> On 13 January 2015 at 04:26, Isaiah Norton <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> https://gmplib.org/
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Carlos Baptista <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh nice, I just did factorial(1000000) and it actually produced an 
>>> answer. What kind of arcane magic is used to make this possible?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> C. F. Baptista
>>>
>>> On 13 January 2015 at 04:22, Erik Schnetter <[email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> julia> factorial(big(171))
>>>>
>>>> 1241018070217667823424840524103103992616605577501693185388951803611996075221691752992751978120487585576464959501670387052809889858690710767331242032218484364310473577889968548278290754541561964852153468318044293239598173696899657235903947616152278558180061176365108428800000000000000000000000000000000000000000
>>>>
>>>> > On Jan 12, 2015, at 22:17 , Isaiah Norton <[email protected] 
>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > julia> factorial(big(21))
>>>> > 51090942171709440000
>>>> >
>>>> > (Julia doesn't auto-promote)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Carlos Baptista <[email protected] 
>>>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>> > I understand that factorial(21) is quite a large number and therefore 
>>>> an OverflowError is perfectly understandable. However, with Octave I can 
>>>> go 
>>>> up to factorial(170) (if I go higher I receive Inf). Is there a way to go 
>>>> beyond factorial(20) in Julia?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Erik Schnetter <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>>>> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
>>>>
>>>> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
>>>> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu/.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to