On Sunday, 25 January 2015 19:24:44 UTC, Christoph Ortner wrote: > > but on a second look, your matrix doesn't look sparse at all, but some > sort of lower triangular structure? I don't think sparsity can help you > here. >
Technically yes you're right it does have a lower triangular structure, however many of the elements are incredibly small so that's why I'm using the round function such that the very small elements = 0. In that way for a 100*201 size a matrix, around 2500 elements are non zero. Do you think that is "sparse" enough to make using sparse matrices useful for me?
