On Saturday, 24 January 2015 22:58:47 UTC-5, Erik Schnetter wrote: > > > No it doesn't -- it would use the same rules that a "@sqrt x+y" would use > today. > > But I was probably just kidding. Function call syntax isn't actually a > problem for me. I just noticed the possibility of using non-parenthethical > function calls and thought I'd comment. >
Actually this would be useful for function calls where one function is applied to a really long, possibly multi-line, argument. A little bit like the $ operator in haskell, it would allow you to write code with fewer parentheses.
