On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 17:39:33 UTC-5, Miles Lubin wrote: > > I'm working on a microbenchmark and found a surprising result (maybe not?) > that Julia is about 2x faster than the same algorithm hand-coded in C. I > wanted to check if I'm doing anything obviously wrong here before reporting > these results. The timings reproduce across different systems and compiler > options (clang/gcc -O2/-O3). >
Is the version of clang that you invoke on the command line the same as the version of llvm that julia uses? I can't reproduce this on OSX 10.9.5 and clang 3.5.1.
