Thanks for filing the issue. For future reference, could you post the issue link here too? This is exactly why we have peakflops(), to detect all these various idiosyncracies. There should ideally be no difference, since, IIRC we are using the same OpenBLAS version in 0.3 and 0.4.
-viral On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 9:05:41 AM UTC+5:30, Seth wrote: > > I rebuilt from scratch and am now getting > > julia> peakflops() > 7.735382541885574e10 > > Which is about 30% slower than in 0.3.4 but much better than before. >
