You can try build with ieee-fp set for icc.

glenn

> On Feb 7, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Mark Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I am rebuilding Julia on my arch linux machine.  I am compiling with the 
> Intel icc/i++ compilers and the Intel MKL using the instructions on 
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia.  I am not using the intel fortran 
> compiler (I set that option equal to 0).
> 
> Building Julia seems to work just fine but when I run
> make testall
> 
> I get the following output:
> mark@inspirone1505: ~/builds/julia
> :> make testall
>     JULIA test/all
>     From worker 2:       * linalg1
>     From worker 3:       * linalg2
>     From worker 2:       * linalg3
>     From worker 2:       * linalg4
>     From worker 3:       * linalg/cholmod
>     From worker 3:       * linalg/umfpack
> exception on 2: ERROR: assertion failed: |func(D) - func(DM)| <= 3.4332275e-5
>   func(D) = 1.048798f0 - 1.5707964f0im
>   func(DM) = 1.0487979650497437 - 0.5797938426309308im
>   difference = 0.9910025278753558 > 3.4332275e-5
>  in error at error.jl:22
>  in test_approx_eq at test.jl:109
>  in anonymous at no file:295
>  in runtests at /home/mark/builds/julia/test/testdefs.jl:5
>  in anonymous at multi.jl:855
>  in run_work_thunk at multi.jl:621
>  in anonymous at task.jl:855
> while loading linalg4.jl, in expression starting on line 263
> ERROR: assertion failed: |func(D) - func(DM)| <= 3.4332275e-5
>   func(D) = 1.048798f0 - 1.5707964f0im
>   func(DM) = 1.0487979650497437 - 0.5797938426309308im
>   difference = 0.9910025278753558 > 3.4332275e-5
>  in anonymous at task.jl:1367
> while loading linalg4.jl, in expression starting on line 263
> while loading /home/mark/builds/julia/test/runtests.jl, in expression 
> starting on li
> ne 39
> 
> Makefile:16: recipe for target 'all' failed
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
> Makefile:426: recipe for target 'testall' failed
> make: *** [testall] Error 2
> 
> 
> I can of course start and use julia but I am wondering if I need to be 
> concerned about this.
> 
> Thanks

Reply via email to