Thanks, it seems composite types is a perfect fit for most of my needs(required fields and their size will typically be known at time of type definition for the present problem).
Regards, m On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 6:57:57 PM UTC+1, Tim Holy wrote: > > Composite types are much higher performance but have no flexibility (you > can't > add new fields later). So which you choose depends on your use case. > > --Tim > > On Monday, February 16, 2015 09:38:13 AM Martin Johansson wrote: > > Yes, composite types could well be the answer! I'm still trying to find > out > > which choices would make the transition from Matlab easiest. This (old) > > discussion <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1263>didn't seem > to > > recommend one over the other (of Dicts and composite types). > > > > Regards, m > > > > On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 4:30:31 PM UTC+1, Johan Sigfrids wrote: > > > Could you not use a composite type for this? It would seem more Julian > to > > > me. > >
