On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 04:51:44 PM Tamas Papp wrote:
> BTW, what is this Val{} construct? I noticed it in the nighly builds (eg
> for lufact with no pivoting), but could not find it in the docs.

Curious, it doesn't show up in the online help but it's here:
http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/?highlight=val#Base.Val{c}
and more elaborately here:
http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/types/#value-types

--Tim

> 
> Tamas
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18 2015, Tim Holy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm fairly certain you can solve this with a stagedfunction and
> > Val{:fieldname}. Left as an exercise for the reader :-).
> > 
> > --Tim
> > 
> > On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 03:57:49 AM Ariel Keselman wrote:
> >> I'm working with arrays of immutables each containing several fields. Now
> >> creating new immutables based on old ones has become a real pain:
> >> 
> >> old = myarray[i]
> >> myarray[i].foo = myimmutable(old.foo, bar, old.x, old.y, etc.)
> >> 
> >> imagine this for 15 fields...!
> >> 
> >> So I made a macro to ease this, it can be used like this:
> >> 
> >> @set myarray i bar=newbar x=newx
> >> 
> >> and the rest of the parameters remain the same. See code below.
> >> 
> >> The problem is that although I can autogenerate the macro for different
> >> types, I cannot use the same function name @set for all types. Each type
> >> has to have its own special macro!
> >> 
> >> The reason is that this macro requires knowledge of the types it is
> >> working
> >> on, something missing at macro "runtime". While stagedfunctions do have
> >> type information, they miss the array symbol name.
> >> 
> >> Maybe a "stagedmacro" could help ;)
> >> 
> >> Do you know how could this be solved?
> >> 
> >> Thanks!
> >> 
> >> immutable IM
> >> 
> >>     aa::Float64
> >>     bb::Float64
> >>     cc::Float64
> >>     dd::Float64
> >>     ee::Float64
> >>     ff::Float64
> >>     gg::Float64
> >>     hh::Float64
> >>     ii::Float64
> >>     jj::Float64
> >>     kk::Float64
> >>     ll::Float64
> >> 
> >> end
> >> 
> >> macro set(ARR, IX, KV...)
> >> 
> >>     d = [p.args[1]=>p.args[2] for p in KV]
> >>     aa = get(d,:aa,:($ARR[$IX].aa))
> >>     bb = get(d,:bb,:($ARR[$IX].bb))
> >>     cc = get(d,:cc,:($ARR[$IX].cc))
> >>     dd = get(d,:dd,:($ARR[$IX].dd))
> >>     ee = get(d,:ee,:($ARR[$IX].ee))
> >>     ff = get(d,:ff,:($ARR[$IX].ff))
> >>     gg = get(d,:gg,:($ARR[$IX].gg))
> >>     hh = get(d,:hh,:($ARR[$IX].hh))
> >>     ii = get(d,:ii,:($ARR[$IX].ii))
> >>     jj = get(d,:jj,:($ARR[$IX].jj))
> >>     kk = get(d,:kk,:($ARR[$IX].kk))
> >>     ll = get(d,:ll,:($ARR[$IX].ll))
> >>     quote
> >>     
> >>         @inbounds $ARR[$IX] =
> >>         
> >>             IM($aa,$bb,$cc,$dd,$ee,$ff,$gg,$hh,$ii,$jj,$kk,$ll)
> >>     
> >>     end
> >> 
> >> end
> >> 
> >> this is used as follows:
> >> 
> >> a = [IM(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1),
> >> 
> >>      IM(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1),
> >>      IM(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1),
> >>      IM(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1),
> >>      IM(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)]
> >> 
> >> @set a 1 aa=9 ll=9
> >> 
> >> # a is now:
> >> # [
> >> 
> >> # IM(1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0)
> >> # IM(9.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,9.0)
> >> # IM(1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0)
> >> # IM(1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0)
> >> # IM(1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0)]

Reply via email to