I actually think the plan of [a,b,c] for construction without concatenation
and [a;b;c] and [a b c] for concatenation is pretty good. I no longer feel
that there's any need for a new bracket like [| |]. The thing that clicked
for me is that [a;] isn't really concatenation at all anyway.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Simon Danisch <[email protected]> wrote:

> As Julia was the first language to introduce me to this kind of
> constructs, I'm not sure about your used terms.
> Concatenate for me would firstly mean, to just connect elements (that's at
> least what the German translation suggests), which I would apply to the
> process of putting the elements together into one array. The elements in my
> case are the Vectors.
> You seem to use it as synonymous with concatenation + flattening (sticking
> to the function names I guess).
> I'd say [a,b] is supposed to concatenate, but shouldn't flatten, right?
> So yes, different syntax for concatenating, and concatenating+flattening
> would make this case much, much clearer.
> Then it's not this fuzzy magic thing, that sometimes happens and sometimes
> not and both clearly encapsulates a concept and use the same basic syntax.
> So:
> [vec, vec] => [vec, vec] # With optional typing, ensuring that you don't
> end up with Any[]
> [vec vec] => [vec vec]  # With optional typing, ensuring that you don't
> end up with Any[]
>
> [| vec, vec |] => [el1, el2, el3, el4, ...]# With optional typing,
> ensuring that you don't end up with Any[]
> [| vec vec |]  => [el el2 ; el3 el4]# With optional typing, ensuring that
> you don't end up with Any[]
>
> I do think, that this is very clear and consistent and doesn't leave
> anything in doubt!
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015 19:00:01 UTC+1 schrieb Simon Danisch:
>
>> Hi there,
>> I thought default concatenation was deprecated, to make it easier to
>> create arrays of arrays... But it became rather impossible and confusing in
>> the horizontal case, from what I see.
>> Is there really not a single method left from the few ways in 0.35 of
>> creating a horizontal vector of vectors?
>> 0.4:
>> https://gist.github.com/SimonDanisch/6972c1c090c608738e83#file-cat0-4-jl
>> 0.3.5:
>> https://gist.github.com/SimonDanisch/058ef76b2583c620b667#file-cat3-5-jl
>>
>> Am I missing something, or is this a bug?!
>>
>> Best,
>> Simon
>>
>

Reply via email to