I'd like to have something like this.
2015-02-27 15:02 GMT-05:00 Jutho <[email protected]>:
> Or in this particular case, maybe their should be some functionality like
> that in Base, or at least in Base.LinAlg, where is often necessary to mix
> complex variables and real variables of the same type used to build to
> complex variables.
>
> Op donderdag 26 februari 2015 08:10:35 UTC+1 schreef Sheehan Olver:
>>
>> Maybe a better alternative is to create an internal function with the
>> same name:
>>
>> real(v…)=Base.real(v…)
>> real{T<:Real}(::Type{Complex{T}})=T
>> real{T<:Real}(::Type{T})=T
>>
>> This will avoid the override leaking from the package.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 26 Feb 2015, at 6:07 pm, Sheehan Olver <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think this is a case where I know the answer but pretending I don’t
>> :)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 26 Feb 2015, at 6:06 pm, Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We have seen quite a few instances where Base functions were extended
>> with methods without restriction to non-Base types, and it caused problems
>> when Julia was updated.
>> >>
>> >> Is randomly breaking in new versions of Julia your style?
>> >
>>
>>
