:D I suck! 

On Thursday, 5 March 2015 15:14:59 UTC+1, Ivar Nesje wrote:
>
>  I'd also like a REPL command which prints out a list of all of the 
>> objects currently in memory space (like 'whos' in Octave)
>
> I'd recommend you try the obscurely named whos() in Julia :)
>
> torsdag 5. mars 2015 14.38.05 UTC+1 skrev David Higgins følgende:
>>
>> Oh, and an IDE is the other requirement of my hard core programming 
>> brethren. The debugger is higher on their list of priorities, but the IDE 
>> is also vital (and one capable of handling projects, etc. we do large scale 
>> numerical projects).
>>
>> David.
>>
>> On Thursday, 5 March 2015 14:35:23 UTC+1, David Higgins wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with many of the comments above. I recommend Julia only to a 
>>> subset of my colleagues. From Matlab the barrier to entry is incredibly low 
>>> and you gain on both speed and price, the only argument against is that 
>>> Matlab users tend to have years of experience in their one language and not 
>>> such a habit of learning new languages.
>>>
>>> I personally moved from mainly GPGPU based programming using C; despite 
>>> the difficulty of that field I found the move painful due to a lack of 
>>> detailed documentation (my perception). Don't get me wrong, there's enough 
>>> documentation out there to make a decent stab at getting things done. But 
>>> I'm used to having a much more nuanced understanding of a language and the 
>>> documentation doesn't yet go into this level of detail, nor are there 
>>> sufficient examples out there.
>>>
>>> For my colleagues who are strong programmers (Python particularly), they 
>>> refuse to touch the language until there's a debugger. At the very least 
>>> they want to be able to set breakpoints and run to them. Personally, I'd 
>>> also like a REPL command which prints out a list of all of the objects 
>>> currently in memory space (like 'whos' in Octave). This seems like a basic 
>>> requirement for REPL based numerical programming.
>>>
>>> Julia is elegant and growing strongly, but I'm still quite selective 
>>> about who I proselytise to. I have the feeling that it will be so many 
>>> times a more comfortable experience in 6-12 months time that I'd rather not 
>>> colour people's early experiences in a negative light if better is soon to 
>>> come.
>>>
>>> David.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to