Ugh. The OSX buildbot failed to upload to AWS, and now there's a permissions problem in cleaning out the contents of contrib/mac/app: http://buildbot.e.ip.saba.us:8010/builders/nuke_osx10.9/builds/7/steps/Do%20your%20thing%2C%20Duke/logs/stdio
It's going to need Elliot to manually log in and fix this. All other platforms appear to have worked though. https://s3.amazonaws.com/julianightlies/bin/linux/x64/0.3/julia-0.3.7-cb9bcae93a-linux64.tar.gz https://s3.amazonaws.com/julianightlies/bin/linux/x86/0.3/julia-0.3.7-cb9bcae93a-linux32.tar.gz https://s3.amazonaws.com/julianightlies/bin/winnt/x64/0.3/julia-0.3.7-cb9bcae93a-win64.exe https://s3.amazonaws.com/julianightlies/bin/winnt/x86/0.3/julia-0.3.7-cb9bcae93a-win32.exe On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:05:01 PM UTC-7, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le lundi 23 mars 2015 à 13:45 -0700, Tony Kelman a écrit : > > Anyone have any objections to me tagging 0.3.7, now-ish? > A few minutes too late, but it's OK on my side, the RPM builds went > fine. > > > Regards > > > Elliot, if you get this, is there anything special on the buildbot > > side to make it post actual release binaries, or is it just the normal > > "rc build" on a tagged sha? > > > > > > On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 9:56:33 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Yeah, that makes sense to me. I'll do a couple more of the > > simple ones that have recently been flagged, then run through > > Elliot's checklist. > > > > > > On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 6:19:35 AM UTC-7, Stefan > > Karpinski wrote: > > We may want to consider doing the minimal number of > > backports now for 0.3.7 and then doing a bunch more > > backports right afterwards. Or at least that's what we > > should do for anything even a little bit risky. > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Tony Kelman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > There have been fewer backports over the past > > month. It would help if people can go through > > and flag any bug fixes or documentation > > updates that would also apply to the > > release-0.3 branch. Either mention the > > @juliabackports user in a commit comment, or > > add the "Backport pending" label to a > > corresponding issue or pull request (if you're > > a contributor who has the permissions to > > modify labels). Anything borderline, ask > > whether it could/should be backported in a > > comment. > > > > > > Going by the so-far-monthly schedule we should > > think about 0.3.7 soon, the one major thing > > that would fix over 0.3.6 would be the Windows > > "need to restart Julia before adding ZMQ from > > WinRPM" problem. > > > > > > > > On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 12:36:32 PM > > UTC-7, Ivar Nesje wrote: > > There is 25 commits already on the > > branch. > > > > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.3.6...release-0.3 > > > > But still 4 issues tagged "backport > > pending" > > > > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues?q=+label%3A"backport+pending"+ > > > > > >
