Correct. Also make sure you use `@time @sync @parallel ...` (note the @sync), 
or you might be fooling yourself about how much benefit you're getting.

--Tim

On Thursday, April 02, 2015 04:35:30 AM Nils Gudat wrote:
> When running code in parallel, I see large declines in the time to execute
> my code (as I expected), but an implausably large drop in memory allocation
> and gc time. Would I be right in assuming that allocation on workers
> processors is just not recorded by @time?

Reply via email to