Hi Mike: I followed your suggestion , the Julia version used by Juno was 0.3.4 and the standalone REPL was 0.3.7 (all x86_64-w64-mingw32), so indeed it seems that new version introduced a bug of some kind.
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 3:12:47 AM UTC-7, Mike Innes wrote: > > Well, this is the first time it's happened this way around :) > > The first thing I would do is open the copy of Julia that Juno is running > using the "open a terminal" command, and see whether that gives the right > results. If the version is different, a bug may have been introduced by a > backport or something similar. > > On 3 April 2015 at 05:50, Kevin Squire <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Hi Siyi, >> >> Can you give a short example of your code? It's generally pretty hard to >> debug these things without that. >> >> Cheers! >> Kevin >> >> On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Siyi Deng <[email protected] <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I have created a c shared library using visual-studio; then I called the >>> c functions in Juno IDE, everything worked as expected. >>> >>> Then I installed the julia command line version, and ran the same script >>> again, and this time it seems that the c functions has not been called >>> properly, no exception was thrown, but the functions never return >>> meaningful values. >>> >>> I was using the 64bit stable release in both cases. >>> >>> Any insight? Thanks! >>> >> >
