Is producing a non-GPL Julia build still on the radar? It might be a nice goal for the 0.4 release, even if we have to build it ourselves (e.g. against MKL, etc.)
On Monday, April 21, 2014 at 5:00:47 PM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > > > On Monday, April 21, 2014 4:40:38 PM UTC-4, Tobias Knopp wrote: >> >> Yes this is awesome work you have done there. Do you plan to implement >> the real-data FFT, DCT and DST in pure Julia also? Then one could really >> think about moving FFTW into a package. Hopefully its author is ok with >> that ;-) >> > > I plan to implement real-data FFTs, and move FFTW into a package. > > Pure-Julia DCT and DST are not in my immediate plans (they are a PITA to > do right because there are 16 types, of which 8 are common); my feeling is > that the need for these is uncommon enough that it's not terrible to have > these in a package instead of in Base. (Hadamard transforms and MDCTs > are also currently in packages.) >
