Hi Seven, yes you are right it's too generic! I will change it to AcFdtd.jl since this stuff was done for room acoustics simulation!
https://github.com/nantonel/AcFdtd.jl Thanks for pointing that out! Niccolo' (ps yes frequency domain is not best suited for auralization might be an application for this) On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 2:59:17 AM UTC+2, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 6:55:20 AM UTC-4, Niccolo' Antonello wrote: >> >> I uploaded this to: >> https://github.com/nantonel/RIM.jl >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnantonel%2FJuRIM.jl&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEWjieYgKIGIh3_g6NxeuCDjWEG7A> >> and: >> https://github.com/nantonel/Fdtd.jl >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnantonel%2FJuFdtd.jl&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHaw7FIt6H1tNH9Tupg5eCtJnWAPQ> >>> >>> >>> > Note that "FDTD" is a bit too generic ... the term could apply to any > time-dependent PDE, and is commonly used for Maxwell's equations. I would > suggest something more specific, like ScalarWaveFDTD > > (Wouldn't FDFD, i.e. the frequency-domain scalar Helmholtz equation, be > more appropriate for this sort of problem? Depends on how wide a bandwidth > you care about and what you want to simulate, I guess.) >
