Ah, thanks for the *very* quick reply.  That’s quite useful.
Did I somehow miss the explanation in the documentation (of 0.4), or does 
that need to be added to the documentation of methods?

Thanks,
Scott

On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 11:41:45 AM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> It means that the argument doesn't get a local name but the method is only 
> called if the argument in that position matches the type on the RHS of the 
> ::
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Scott Jones <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Just what does it mean, if there is a type but no formal parameter name, 
>> in a function definition?
>> I tried to find it in the documentation, but nothing came up...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to