As Jeff says...this is why `similar` exists.

--Tim

On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:03:02 AM Mauro wrote:
> Thanks Jameson and here the context:
> 
> # Initializes an array which has a's container but b's eltype
> function f(a::AbstractVector, b::AbstractVector)
>     Eb = eltype(b)              # this is type-stable
>     Ca = typeof(a).name.primary # this is not type-stable
>     return Ca(Eb, 5)            # assumes Ca supports the normal Array
> constructor end
> 
> The last line would probably better use copy+convert but for that I
> still need to make Ca{Eb,1}.  Note that Ca is always a leaftype and I
> don't want to climb the type hierarchy, so I think your remark about the
> subtypes does not apply.
> 
> Here the typed code:
> julia> @code_warntype f([1,2], [1.])
> Variables:
>   a::Array{Int64,1}
>   b::Array{Float64,1}
>   Eb::Type{Float64}
>   Ca::Type{T}         # <---
> 
> Body:
>   begin  # none, line 3:
>       Eb = Float64 # line 4:
>       Ca =
> (top(getfield))((top(getfield))(typeof(a::Array{Int64,1})::Type{Array{Int64
> ,1}},:name)::TypeName,:primary)::Type{T} # line 5: return
> (Ca::Type{T})(Eb::Type{Float64},5)::Any
>   end::Any
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 22:56, Jameson Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Your question presupposes that you can write useful generic code with the
> > return result, but does not provide any context on your problem. When a
> > similar question was asked previously on the mailing list, I recall
> > pointing out that the code the author was attempting to write was not
> > going
> > to function as intended. Perhaps you can provide some more context?
> > 
> > The observation that I am making is that you cannot arbitrarily pick apart
> > a type and expect everything to line up afterwards. For example, it is
> > possible to have the following:
> > abstract AbstractTy{A,B}
> > type Ty1 <: AbstractTy{Int, Float64} end
> > type Ty2{B,A} <: AbstractTy{A,B} end
> > 
> > So you can't generically reconstruct some arbitrary subtype by some
> > generic
> > rearrangement of its type parameters.
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:34 PM Mauro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I have a parameterized type and want to get the primary-type.  For
> >> example, I got
> >> 
> >> a = Array{Int,2}
> >> 
> >> is there a type-stable way to get Array?  This is non-type stable:
> >> 
> >> f(t::Type) = t.name.primary
> >> 
> >> as the inferred return type is Type.
> >> 
> >> This does not work:
> >> 
> >> f{T, S}(::Type{T{S...}}) = T
> >> 
> >> Any ideas? Thanks, M

Reply via email to