El sábado, 25 de abril de 2015, 9:08:16 (UTC-5), Pooya escribió:
>
> These did not work. In one of my functions I am returning a function 
> (myfunc) in output that is defined like myfunc(x;args...) = 
> g(x,y,z,m,n;args...). This was working up to now when I am using myfunc in 
> another function (and also when I use it directly in the global scope). I 
> guess that is causing some problems, but I can't figure out why yet. I am 
> using Debug package, but getting some weird outputs!
>
>
Try making a minimal example (i.e., a small example that reproduces the 
problem) and post it here or at gist.github.com so that we can try and 
diagnose the issue.

 

> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 12:28:53 AM UTC-4, David P. Sanders wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> El viernes, 24 de abril de 2015, 21:44:00 (UTC-5), Pooya escribió:
>>>
>>> I have been using julia in Mac Terminal and IJulia notebook for a while 
>>> and they have been fine. But now I am getting this error: "The kernel 
>>> appears to have died. It will restart automatically." in IJulia, and the 
>>> following in Terminal after I run one of my codes. It restarts the kernel 
>>> in both cases! Can anyone help?
>>>
>>> julia(8724,0x7fff7315e310) malloc: *** error for object 0x7feed745df10: 
>>> pointer being realloc'd was not allocated
>>>
>>> *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
>>>
>>> signal (6): Abort trap: 6
>>>
>>> __pthread_kill at /usr/lib/system/libsystem_kernel.dylib (unknown line)
>>>
>>> Abort trap: 6
>>>
>>
>> My usual solution for these kinds of problems (i.e. problems in which 
>> it's unclear what the problem is and it was previously working!) is the 
>> following sequence, testing if it now works after each step
>>
>> (i) Pkg.update()   
>>
>> (ii) Pkg.build("IJulia")
>>
>> (iii) Remove entire .julia directory and reinstall IJulia with 
>> Pkg.add("IJulia").  (This is overkill for what would basically be "get the 
>> latest version of all dependencies", but it can't do any harm...)
>>
>> Of course it might be an actual bug, in which case these steps won't help 
>> at all...
>>
>

Reply via email to