apologies ... rather than "display" below, i should have used "figure"; so, perhaps
figure(1) and figure(2) will do what you need. On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 9:00:27 AM UTC-7, cdm wrote: > > does using > > display(1) #display plot for y1 > > and > > display(2) #display plot for y2 > > get you what > you were after? > >
