On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 9:50:10 AM UTC-4, Yuuki Soho wrote: > > There's one argument for * over +. That string concatenation is not > commutative, and that + main property is to be commutative. > > Personally I don't mind * for string concatenation. If anything I would > prefer to have matlab style concatenation, using []; it would make sense to > use concatenation syntax for concatenation. >
+100 to the suggestion of using [] for a general concatenation operator! (could ^ be deprecated as well, and replaced with something that also doesn't look either like bitwise XOR or exponentiation?)
