On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 6:37:34 PM UTC+2, Patrick O'Leary wrote: > > On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-5, François Fayard wrote: >> >> I just found that the project Coq is using ++ for string concatenation. >> It has the advantage of not overloading + and still be similar to Python's >> +. What do you think ? >> > > (And Haskell, as discussed in innumerable prior conversations on this > topic.) >
I was just trying to find a good notation. This one seems to be the best to me so far. Did Python have this much trouble when they introduced ''.join([...])? > I hope they had. It's very bad ;-) Sorry for that, I am new to Julia and I did not know all the discussion on that topic. As you seem to know the history of the string concatenation syntax, do you know what is the position of the project leaders? "too late to change", "we might change when we have a good syntax" ?
