Nevermind.  I think the issue was that my git tag was out of sync with my 
julia METADATA tags.

Zenna

On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 5:57:53 PM UTC-4, Zenna Tavares wrote:
>
> I should also add that Pkg.publish() tells me that "There are no METADATA 
> changes to publish".
>
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 5:45:11 PM UTC-4, Zenna Tavares wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to publish my package, AbstractDomains 
>> <https://github.com/zenna/AbstractDomains.jl> and having some issues.  I 
>> already registered AbstractDomains before, but failed to tag it.  I am 
>> attempting to both tag it and update with recent changes.
>>
>> Currently, if I run
>>
>> git tag
>>
>> I get back 
>>
>> v0.0.1
>>
>>
>> If in Julia I run Pkg.status() I get back 
>>
>> 60 additional packages:
>>  - AbstractDomains               0.0.0-             master
>>
>>
>> But if I try to tag, I get back:
>>
>> julia> Pkg.tag("AbstractDomains")
>> INFO: Tagging AbstractDomains v0.0.1
>> fatal: tag 'v0.0.1' already exists
>> ERROR: failed process: Process(`git 
>> --work-tree=/home/zenna/.julia/v0.3/AbstractDomains 
>> --git-dir=/home/zenna/.julia/v0.3/AbstractDomains/.git tag --annotate 
>> --message 'AbstractDomains v0.0.1 [f7511f9061]' v0.0.1 
>> f7511f90619e3b64303553a5c45456822acb1afa`, ProcessExited(128)) [128]
>>  in pipeline_error at process.jl:502
>>  in run at pkg/git.jl:22
>>  in tag at pkg/entry.jl:568
>>  in tag at pkg/entry.jl:524
>>  in anonymous at pkg/dir.jl:28
>>  in cd at ./file.jl:20
>>  in cd at pkg/dir.jl:28
>>  in tag at pkg.jl:47
>>
>> If I try to tag at v0.0.2
>>
>> julia> Pkg.tag("AbstractDomains", VersionNumber(0,0,2))
>> ERROR: 0.0.2 is not a valid initial version (try 0.0.0, 0.0.1, 0.1 or 1.0
>> )
>>  in error at error.jl:21
>>  in check_new_version at version.jl:177
>>  in tag at pkg/entry.jl:557
>>  in tag at pkg/entry.jl:524
>>  in anonymous at pkg/dir.jl:28
>>  in cd at ./file.jl:20
>>  in cd at pkg/dir.jl:28
>>
>>
>> What is wrong, why does Julia think I'm both at v0.0.1 and v0.0.0. More 
>> importantly, how can I fix it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>

Reply via email to