Maybe we should include bytes freed as well.
> On May 1, 2015, at 8:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 2:45:16 AM UTC+10, [email protected] wrote: >> Yes, that makes much more sense! So it's really "byte allocations" rather >> than "bytes allocated". Thanks. > > Its bytes allocated not bytes in use. > > bytes in use = bytes allocated - bytes freed
