Very good points! I'd like to teach them something where I think the base concepts are good (like Scheme, CLU, or Julia), but also something that they can keep getting deeper and deeper into, as they grow older... (at least until they bankrupt me by going to MIT!)
On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 10:47:13 AM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > One of the advantages I do think that Julia has for teaching is that it > makes it unusually easy to see what's happening on many levels. Teaching > with high-level languages like Python or Java – anything but C for that > matter – tends to construct a wall between the safe "walled garden" and the > lower levels where "dark magic" happens. There is still some dark magic at > the heart of Julia, of course, but it's way deeper down. Want to understand > how integers are represented? Use the bits function and see. Ditto for > floating-point numbers. Want to know how different kinds of strings are > represented? Just look at their .data field. Want know how Dicts work? Just > call dump on a dict. Want to know how the computer executes your function? > Call code_native on it. This ability is very powerful for teaching how > computers work – and it's all available without the difficulties that > teaching with C entails. > > > On May 7, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Tamas Papp <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Julia is a great language, but I am wondering why you think it is the > right match for children. IMO the comparative advantages of Julia are > 1. parametric polymorphism, > 2. macros, > 3. ability to generate very fast code with very little help. > I don't think that any of these appeal very much to beginners, and > especially not to children. > > At the moment Julia is comparatively weak in > a. graphics, > b. debugging (especially the kind aided by the IDE), > c. progressive interactive development. > I imagine that these would be very important to anyone learning to > program, including children. Several languages have variations that provide > these, eg Scheme (Racket, formerly PLT Scheme), or Python; there are > corresponding books for children, etc. > > Best, > > Tamas > > On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 2:00:30 PM UTC+2, Scott Jones wrote: >> >> Has anybody had any experience teaching Julia to kids? >> This is *not* a joke, my almost 9 year old son has a science project due >> next week. >> He knows some Lua (which he originally learned from the ComputerCraft mod >> in MineCraft, and then using the Codea >> app for the iPad), but he's seen how I've fallen in love with Julia, and >> he wants to use Julia for his project >> (which is doing some tests of peoples visual and auditory memory, using >> random 7 digit sequences, >> and then doing some simple calculations on the results...). >> He's basically a lazy boy [see the following link, to understand that >> that is the highest complement I pay people :-) (see >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_for_Love#The_Tale_of_the_Man_Who_Was_Too_Lazy_to_Fail >> ] >> and he wants the computer to do a lot of his work for him... >> >> >>
