I've seen a few proprietary code bases that are 2-3x that big, which is not huge, but pretty substantial. I suspect that not many Julia code bases have had time to grow much larger than that. I think that this is large enough to be confident that nothing horrible happens when the code base gets larger – it's just as manageable as it is in Ruby or Python. The main issue is startup time when loading all your modules (which Jameson is working on addressing for 0.4).
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Páll Haraldsson <pall.haralds...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 4:32:01 PM UTC, Tim Holy wrote: >> >> No clue how this fares, but my lab has a code base of approximately 35k >> lines >> if you include tests. This does not include documentation, nor does it >> include >> any packages. >> > > Thanks, > > Anyone want to "raise"? :) > > Now, that is fairly big.. But could you guess the ratio of tests/"real > code"..? > > I assume you mean one "code base" for one "project"? Or do you have many > and this is combined.. not sure if easy to divide or how you scientists > work.. > >
