Hi Viral and Stefan,

Thanks for the replies.

To be clear, I have no opposition to a third party organization (e.g. Julia Computing) hosting the web site as an in-kind donation to Julia (the community project). The GNOME website, for instance, is currently hosted by Canonical, and it has been hosted by Red Hat in the past. The gnome.org domain, on the other hand, is owned by the GNOME Foundation, which is how I believe it should be for a community .org.

The administrative cost to owning and periodically renewing a domain is nevertheless nonzero, even though it is less than the cost of hosting web/email/etc. I agree that it is important to make sure that the organization tasked with maintaining it is able to do so without things falling through the cracks, and I'd hope that NumFocus could handle this as a fiscal sponsor; in fact, they mention hosting as a service they offer at <http://numfocus.org/foundation/>.

As Viral mentions, when relying on NumFocus to do more it is important to make sure they are adequately funded. I will plan to think more about how we can raise funds for them to do Julia-related things. As a first step, I just myself joined NumFocus as a Supporting Member, which I had not realized was possible until now.

Jim

On 05/14/2015 07:13 PM, Viral Shah wrote:

As much as I would like to do so, I also want to have enough funding for the "Julia foundation" (NumFocus) in place before transferring over community resources.

We look at everything closely so that things don't fall through the cracks. For someone else to do that, we need an organisational structure.

We are working hard with a couple of folks on funding some people to work full time for the foundation. I welcome any ideas on raising funds to pay for a couple of developers and a part time project manager, to start with.

-viral

On 15 May 2015 5:47 am, "Stefan Karpinski" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Currently I own the domain, but transferring it to NumFocus would
    be fine if they do that (which I can find out).

    On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Jim Garrison <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Here is a related question: Who will own and operate the
        julialang.org <http://julialang.org> domain?  Would you be
        willing to transfer it to NumFocus or a similar nonprofit,
        community entity?


        On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 10:55:00 AM UTC-7, Brian Granger
        wrote:

            Congrats on Julia Computing stuff! We (IPython/Jupyter)
            are always thinking about various approaches to making
            open source sustainable and it is great to see
            explorations like this. I wish you the best of success!!!

            I wanted to share some thoughts and questions about
            trademark as it relates to open source projects. These
            thoughts have come out of many years of thinking about,
            and even enforcing, trademarks in the context of
            Jupyter/IPython.

            With IPython/Jupyter, the yet-to-be-filed trademarks
            (there is a bit of subtlety about the IPython trademark -
            that is another topic) will belong to our non-profit
            sponsor, NumFocus (we will transfer it to them). Along
            with that, we will be developing a trademark usage policy
            that clarifies to the community how our names and logos
            can be used. I am guessing that our policy will be similar
            to that of other open source projects like Python:

            https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/

            It is likely that we will have a trademark policy that
            allows generous usage of the names IPython/Jupyter by the
            open source community, but we would not allow companies to
            use the trademarks in ways that would confuse users. A
            company could say "our platform uses the open source
            Project Jupyter" but not "our company is called
            JupyterFoo." IANAL, but it is my understanding that the
            bar for trademark confusion is relatively low and that
            there is a real danger to not enforcing trademarks, so
            these issues are important to understand.

            I think you can see where this is going wrt Julia...

            * Who holds the trademarks on Julia? NumFocus, an
            individual or Julia Computing?
            * What is the trademark policy of that entity? If it
            doesn't exist, who will create it?
            * Is Julia Computing infringing upon the Julia trademark?
            Has the trademark owner given permission to Julia Compute
            to use the trademark?
            * By using the name "Julia" in the company and open source
            project, is the trademark owner creating a precedence of
            not enforcing the trademark?
            * Do you want *other* companies to be allowed to use
            "Julia" trademarks in their name?

            I want to be clear - I am all for commercialization
            efforts around open source and am very excited about where
            Julia is headed. I also don't have any ideas about what
            the answers to these questions should be for your community.

            Cheers,

            Brian


            On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 1:20:15 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah
            wrote:

                Hello all,


                You may have seen today’s Hacker News story about
                Julia Computing:
                https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9516298


                As you all know, we are committed to Julia being high
                quality and open source.


                The existence of Julia Computing was discussed a year
                ago at JuliaCon 2014, though we recognize that not
                everyone is aware. We set up Julia Computing to assist
                those who asked for help building Julia applications
                and deploying Julia in production.  We want Julia to
                be widely adopted by the open source community, for
                research in academia, and for production software in
                companies.  Julia Computing provides support,
                consulting, and training for customers, in order to
                help them build and deploy Julia applications.


                We are committed to all the three organizations that
                focus on different users and use cases of Julia:


                1. The open source Julia project is housed at the
                NumFocus Foundation. http://numfocus.org/projects/

                2. Research on various aspects of Julia is anchored in
                Alan’s group at MIT.
                http://www-math.mit.edu/~edelman/research.php
                <http://www-math.mit.edu/%7Eedelman/research.php>

                3. Julia Computing works with customers who are
                building Julia applications.
                http://www.juliacomputing.com/


                Our customers make Julia Computing self-funded. We are
                grateful that they have created full time
                opportunities for us to follow our passions. Open
                source development will never cease.


                You may have questions. Please shoot them here. We
                will respond back with a detailed blog post.


                -viral



Reply via email to