I have seen a lot of discussions on this issue, in particular in relation
to the coming 0.4 release. Since I must admit I got completely lost in the
debate: is there an agreement on this? Since it is such a fundamental
element, which can break more or less any piece of code (and is also very
much connected to the switch to array views, as far as I understood), is it
possibly wiser to wait for 0.4 for a first test drive of Julia?
Thanks.
Il giorno giovedì 19 giugno 2014 11:18:10 UTC+2, Carlos Baptista ha scritto:
>
> If I do this:
>
> A = rand(10, 10)
> x = A[:, 3]
>
> then typeof(x) is Array{Float64, 1}. However if I do this:
>
> A = rand(10, 10)
> x = A[:, 3:3]
>
> then typeof(x) is Array{Float64, 2}.
>
> Is this a bug, or is this behaviour the intention of the developers? In
> case of the latter: why?
>
