Thanks Andreas.

Indeed ... but I am using 0.4 with ldltfact and it is complaining about the 
type of the matrix, which is OK. 

I am realy confused with this error.

On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 2:22:30 PM UTC-3, Andreas Noack wrote:
>
> In 0.3 the sparse LDLt and Cholesky factorizations are both in the 
> cholfact function. If the matrix is symmetric, but not positive definite 
> the result of cholfact will be an LDLt factorization. In 0.4 the 
> factorizations have been split into cholfact and ldltfact.
>
> Den onsdag den 27. maj 2015 kl. 12.34.30 UTC-4 skrev Eduardo Lenz:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I am trying to solve a linear system defined by a Symmetric sparse 
>> matrix. The lufact is working well, but as the matrix is symmetric, I 
>> intend to use ldltfact.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it is returning the following error:
>>
>> ERROR: `ldltfact` has no method matching 
>> ldltfact(::SparseMatrixCSC{Float64,Int64})
>>
>> but my matrix is reported as 
>>
>> typeof(A)
>> SparseMatrixCSC{Float64,Int64}.
>>
>> Is it an error or Im doing something wrong.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduardo.
>>
>

Reply via email to