Fixed. Regarding the other one you mentioned:

(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `__imp_CoUninitialize'


Maybe you tried/corrected this already, but for future reference the issue
here is that the LLVM shared library version apparently (now?) needs to
link to ole32. I was able to work around this by running `make VERBOSE=1`
and then copying and re-running the last (failing) g++ command string
`-lole32` added at the end. I guess we could try to get a patch in, but
it's going to be continual whack-a-mole because LLVM does not support this
build configuration.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM, J Luis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks.
> Meanwhile I had to do a couple of dirty patches to reach this point but
> probably they are specific of the MSYS2 build.
>
> sexta-feira, 29 de Maio de 2015 às 14:34:18 UTC+1, Isaiah escreveu:
>>
>> I was looking yesterday at the issue you opened about this. Let me see if
>> LLVM finally finished compiling and I will push my fix if so.
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:30 AM, J Luis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone (not many, I'm afraid) can give me an hint on what I could try to
>>> fix this error? It seams that I'm nearly there but can't get over this one
>>> by myself.
>>>
>>> My goal with this is that I would like to play a bit with Qt.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>     CC src/codegen.o
>>> codegen.cpp: In function 'llvm::Value* emit_expr(jl_value_t*,
>>> jl_codectx_t*, bool, bool, jl_sym_t**)':
>>> codegen.cpp:3229:59: error: no matching function for call to
>>> 'llvm::IRBuilder<>::CreateCall(llvm::Value*)'
>>>          builder.CreateCall(prepare_call(resetstkoflw_func));
>>>                                                            ^
>>> codegen.cpp:3229:59: note: candidates are:
>>> In file included from codegen.cpp:55:0:
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1468:13: note: llvm::CallInst*
>>> llvm::IRBuilder<preserveNames, T, Inserter>::CreateCall(llvm::Value*,
>>> llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, const llvm::Twine&) [with bool
>>> preserveNames = true; T = llvm::ConstantFolder; Inserter = llvm::
>>> IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true>]
>>>    CallInst *CreateCall(Value *Callee, ArrayRef<Value *> Args,
>>>              ^
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1468:13: note:   candidate
>>> expects 3 arguments, 1 provided
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1473:13: note: llvm::CallInst*
>>> llvm::IRBuilder<preserveNames, T, Inserter>::CreateCall(llvm::
>>> FunctionType*, llvm::Value*, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, const llvm::
>>> Twine&) [with bool preserveNames = true; T = llvm::ConstantFolder;
>>> Inserter = llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true>]
>>>    CallInst *CreateCall(llvm::FunctionType *FTy, Value *Callee,
>>>              ^
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1473:13: note:   candidate
>>> expects 4 arguments, 1 provided
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1478:13: note: llvm::CallInst*
>>> llvm::IRBuilder<preserveNames, T, Inserter>::CreateCall(llvm::Function*,
>>> llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Value*>, const llvm::Twine&) [with bool
>>> preserveNames = true; T = llvm::ConstantFolder; Inserter = llvm::
>>> IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true>]
>>>    CallInst *CreateCall(Function *Callee, ArrayRef<Value *> Args,
>>>              ^
>>> V:/julia/usr/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h:1478:13: note:   candidate
>>> expects 3 arguments, 1 provided
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> quarta-feira, 27 de Maio de 2015 às 19:01:33 UTC+1, J Luis escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unless something has changed in the past month, the biggest issue with
>>>>> the recommended Make.user options is that LLDB uses some C++11 features
>>>>> that are not supported by GCC on Windows (call_once and some other
>>>>> mutex-related stuff).
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/Keno/Cxx.jl/issues/62#issuecomment-93184018
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I'm not sure if LLDB is strictly necessary for the Clang-only
>>>>> functionality (I do remember some linking errors without it, but that was 
>>>>> a
>>>>> number of months ago).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, insisted a bit more using a avoid the problems strategy I managed
>>>> to build llvm but than hit the 'call_once' problem you mentioned. Restarted
>>>> this time with
>>>>
>>>>  BUILD_LLDB=0
>>>>
>>>> and ...
>>>>
>>>> V:/julia/deps/llvm-svn/tools/lldb/source/API/SBValue.cpp:1663:38:
>>>> warning: unknown conversion type character 'l' in format [-Wformat=]
>>>>                       addr.GetOffset());
>>>>                                       ^
>>>> V:/julia/deps/llvm-svn/tools/lldb/source/API/SBValue.cpp:1663:38:
>>>> warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
>>>> llvm[6]: Building Release+Asserts Archive Library liblldbAPI.a
>>>> /v/julia/deps/llvm-svn/Makefile.rules:880: recipe for target 'all'
>>>> failed
>>>> make[4]: *** [all] Error 1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, it's still trying to build LLDB. Is this the linking errors you
>>>> were referring?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:15 PM, J Luis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks. Running make again let me advance a bit more but now I get
>>>>>> tons of errors of this type
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cannot export
>>>>>> ZN4llvm8DenseMapIPKNS_5ValueENS_19SelectionDAGBuilder17DanglingDebugInfoENS_12DenseMapInfoIS3_EENS_6detail12DenseMapPairIS3_S5_EEE4growEj:
>>>>>> symbol not defined
>>>>>> Cannot export
>>>>>> ZN4llvm8DenseMapIPKNS_5ValueENS_3ISD8NodeTypeENS_12DenseMapInfoIS3_EENS_6detail12DenseMapPairIS3_S5_EEE4growEj:
>>>>>> symbol not defined
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, it seams that build LLVM SVN is not straightforward with MSYS2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> segunda-feira, 25 de Maio de 2015 às 23:57:22 UTC+1, andrew cooke
>>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if you run make again, do you get a more helpful error?  if it's
>>>>>>> running multiple threads sometimes the logging is confused and 
>>>>>>> erstarting
>>>>>>> (and immediately hitting the error) is helpful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, 25 May 2015 17:38:47 UTC-3, J Luis wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm, I~m confused with this error. What failed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OpenBLAS build complete. (BLAS CBLAS LAPACK LAPACKE)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   OS               ... WINNT
>>>>>>>>   Architecture     ... x86_64
>>>>>>>>   BINARY           ... 64bit
>>>>>>>>   Use 64 bits int    (equivalent to "-i8" in Fortran)
>>>>>>>>   C compiler       ... GCC  (command line : gcc -m64)
>>>>>>>>   Fortran compiler ... GFORTRAN  (command line : gfortran -m64)
>>>>>>>>   Library Name     ... libopenblasp-r0.2.14.a (Multi threaded; Max
>>>>>>>> num-threads is 16)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To install the library, you can run "make
>>>>>>>> PREFIX=/path/to/your/installation install".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Makefile:49: recipe for target 'julia-deps' failed
>>>>>>>> make: *** [julia-deps] Error 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> segunda-feira, 25 de Maio de 2015 às 20:33:11 UTC+1, J Luis
>>>>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll start with it than. Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> segunda-feira, 25 de Maio de 2015 às 20:26:23 UTC+1, Keno Fischer
>>>>>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure, I've never tried. The regular Julia makefile build
>>>>>>>>>> usually works fine though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, J Luis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I may try one of these days but what would guess would the
>>>>>>>>>>> best way to build LLVM? Will it be expected to work with a VS build?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> segunda-feira, 25 de Maio de 2015 às 20:07:08 UTC+1, Keno
>>>>>>>>>>> Fischer escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody has ever tried. It shouldn't be too hard
>>>>>>>>>>>> to make work, but will definitely require some modifications to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cxx.jl.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:00 PM, J Luis <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does it worth trying or it's known that it won't work? (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could try to build LLVM SVN with VS, if that helps)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to