Ah, another great suggestion! Thanks!
On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 7:06:09 PM UTC+2, Seth wrote: > > > > On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 7:06:09 AM UTC-7, Scott Jones wrote: >> >> Great! Thanks! That also sounds like it will help with something that >> just came up today, somebody else wanted to know how to do just that also >> (I'm proselytizing here in Belgium, getting everybody into Julia!) >> >> > Another way that I recently discovered is to use sortperm(): basically, > given an unsorted vector of sortable values (like frequencies), sortperm > will return a vector of integers representing the indices of the original > vector in sorted order. That is, > > sortperm([1.1, 5.5, 4.4, 2.2]) will return [1,4,3,2]. > > It's also very fast (I used it to replace 5 lines of code in LightGraphs > and sped up betweenness centrality by over 60%). >
