:-( I wonder what’s the magic incantation those LLVM binaries use.
-viral > On 31-May-2015, at 9:29 am, Seth <catch...@bromberger.com> wrote: > > Nope: > > error during bootstrap: > LoadError(at "sysimg.jl" line 278: LoadError(at "constants.jl" line 94: > Base.AssertionError(msg="Float64(π) == Float64(big(π))"))) > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:30:49 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: > Oh, ok - let me restart. > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:29:50 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > Yes, those steps are good. Could you leave out the JULIA_CPU_ARCH for now? > > -viral > > > > > On 30-May-2015, at 10:56 pm, Seth <catc...@bromberger.com> wrote: > > > > Oh, also export JULIA_CPU_ARCH=arm1176jzf-s. Build running now - will > > report back in about 12 hours :) > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:24:15 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: > > On it. make distcleanall; git pull; make? > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:23:05 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > Could you guys try with the latest master, with a fresh clone? I am no > > longer passing any flags to LLVM and also using LLVM 3.6.1. > > > > -viral > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 7:18:41 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: > > We need to figure out the magic they use to build those binaries. What if > > you remove all LLVM flags in the Julia build in the arm section of make.inc > > and let LLVM do it's thing? > > > > -viral > > > > On 29 May 2015 9:27 pm, "Daan Huybrechs" <daan.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On the other hand, building with the LLVM binaries from llvm.org does still > > work on a Pi 2 to get a working REPL - I just tested that with gcc-4.9 and > > LLVM 3.6.1 today. > > > > Daan >
