FWIW, many libraries choose to use plural names, so that they can have types within those libraries with singular names--e.g., DataFrames.jl has a DataFrames type.
I don't know if you'll need a ParserCombinator type, but if you do, this would be the way to go. (I also think it sounds better pluralized in many cases, but that could simply be because that's what I'm used to...) Cheers, Kevin On Sunday, May 31, 2015, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParserCombinator.jl > > On Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:03:29 UTC-3, David P. Sanders wrote: >> >> >> >> El domingo, 31 de mayo de 2015, 19:52:34 (UTC+2), andrew cooke escribió: >>> >>> >>> And we already have a rename. Now known as >>> https://github.com/andrewcooke/ParComb.jl >>> >> >> How about ParserCombinator.jl? >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, 31 May 2015 11:16:43 UTC-3, andrew cooke wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> There's a new parser library for Julia 0.3 and 0.4 - >>>> https://github.com/andrewcooke/SimpleParser.jl >>>> >>>> It's got some rough edges that I hope to clean up in the next week or >>>> so, with a first release probably next weekend. >>>> >>>> Bug reports welcome. >>>> >>>> It's "parser combinator" style, but uses trampolining rather than >>>> recursive function calls. It also has support for packrat parsing (ie it >>>> caches intermediate matches and can return alternative parses). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>>
