This looks really amazing. Thanks for contributing it!

Best,
--Tim

On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 10:10:45 AM Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm announcing the availability of a new package for cross-language
> interoperability called "Polyglot", already available as a registered
> package: https://github.com/wavexx/Polyglot.jl
> 
> Polyglot allows to call a remote function in a supported language with
> automatic serialization of basic types. It also allows to export local
> Julia functions to the remote system with the same method (that is, the
> remote system can call back Julia with regular functions). Local/remote
> functions can also call each-other recursively without any limitation.
> 
> For a brief example, please see:
> 
> http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/Polyglot.jl#overview
> 
> The currently supported languages are PHP, Perl, Python (2/3/PyPy) and
> JavaScript (Node.js). A Common Lisp (sbcl/clisp) and Julia backends are
> also in the works.
> 
> I'm actively looking for feedback, especially about the interface of the
> module. I'd love to introduce some uniformity and reuse generic method
> names if possible. Please keep that in mind: the package is stable, but
> I'll shuffle things around in the beginning if needed.
> 
> For those interested, "Polyglot" spawns long-lived coprocesses which
> communicate through a simple serial protocol. While not being as
> efficient as a dl-opened interpreter, this method allows to have
> multiple interpreters running at the same time, with different versions
> and potentially running on different systems. When the Julia backend
> will be ready, Polyglot will have many similarities to current's Julia
> parallel/multiprocessing interface in both API and design.
> 
> Polyglot is almost a direct port of the Python "Bond" package
> (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-bond). In fact, it shares the same
> driver infrastructure and I currently recommend to read through it's
> practical examples and language support section (at least until I finish
> writing the remaining documentation).
> 
> Please share your ideas!

Reply via email to